D&I Literature Hub

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Dearing JW, Cox JG. Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs. 2018;37(2):183-190.
• Estabrooks C, Derksen L, Winther C, et al. The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implementation Science. 2008;3(1):49.
• Green LW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:151-174.
• [Book] Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• DuBois JM, Bailey-Burch B, Bustillos D, et al. Ethical issues in mental health research: the case for community engagement. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2011;24(3):208-214.
• Gopichandran V, Luyckx VA, Biller-Andorno N, et al. Developing the ethics of implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):161.
• Macklin R. Ethical Challenges in Implementation Research. Public Health Ethics. 2014;7(1):86-93.
• Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, et al. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001346.
• Helfrich, C. D., Hartmann, C. W., Parikh, T. J., & Au, D. H. (2019). Promoting health equity through de-implementation research. Ethnicity & Disease, 29(Suppl 1), 93.

VIA IS-2 INSTITUTES AND DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Kirchner JE, Smith JL, Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Proctor EK. Getting a clinical innovation into practice: An introduction to implementation strategies. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112467. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.042. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PMID: 31488332; PMCID: PMC7239693.
• Lewis, C. C., Klasnja, P., Powell, B. J., Lyon, A. R., Tuzzio, L., Jones, S., Walsh-Bailey, C., & Weiner, B. (2018). From Classification to Causality: Advancing Understanding of Mechanisms of Change in Implementation Science. Frontiers in public health, 6, 136.
• Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;44(2):177–94.
• Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Williams NJ, Aarons GA, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, McHugh SM, Weiner BJ. Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda. Front Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;7:3. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003. PMID: 30723713; PMCID: PMC6350272.
• Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 1;8:139. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. PMID: 24289295; PMCID: PMC3882890.
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011; 38(2):65-76.
• Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):42. doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Akiba CF, Powell BJ, Pence BW, Nguyen MXB, Golin C, Go V. The case for prioritizing implementation strategy fidelity measurement: benefits and challenges. Transl Behav Med. 2021;12(2):335-342. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibab138
• Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443-451. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
• Bopp M, Saunders RP, Lattimore D. The tug-of-war: fidelity versus adaptation throughout the health promotion program life cycle. J Prim Prev. 2013;34(3):193-207. doi:10.1007/s10935-013-0299-y
• Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(2):164-173. doi:10.1002/nur.20373
• Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2:40. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
• Chambers DA, Norton WE. The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(4):S124-S131. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.011
• Haynes A, Brennan S, Redman S, et al. Figuring out fidelity: a worked example of the methods used to identify, critique and revise the essential elements of a contextualised intervention in health policy agencies. Implement Sci. 2016;11:23. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0378-6
• [Book] Linnan L, Steckler A. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. Jossey-Bass; 2002.
• Perez D, Van der Stuyft P, Zabala MC, Castro M, Lefevre P. A modified theoretical framework to assess implementation fidelity of adaptive public health interventions. Implement Sci. 2016;11:91. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0457-8
• Slaughter SE, Hill JN, Snelgrove-Clarke E. What is the extent and quality of documentation and reporting of fidelity to implementation strategies: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2015;10:129. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0320-3
• Toomey E, Hardeman W, Hankonen N, et al. Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020;8(1):132-151. doi:10.1080/21642850.2020.1738935
• Walton H, Spector A, Williamson M, Tombor I, Michie S. Developing quality fidelity and engagement measures for complex health interventions. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(1):39-60. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12394
  

Via IS-2 Winter 2021 Institute

• Escoffery, C., Lebow-Skelley, E., Haardoerfer, R. et al. A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implementation Sci 13, 125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0815-9
• Green, L. W., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the health professions, 29(1), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705284445
• Kirk, M.A., Moore, J.E., Wiltsey Stirman, S. et al. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implementation Sci 15, 56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01021-y
• Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy. 1988. 17:251-267.
• Movsisyan, A., Arnold, L., Evans, R. et al. Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: a systematic review of guidance. Implementation Sci 14, 105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5
• Pfadenhauer, L.M., Gerhardus, A., Mozygemba, K. et al. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implementation Sci 12, 21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5
• Sze Lin Yoong, Katarzyna Bolsewicz, Alice Grady, Rebecca Wyse, Rachel Sutherland, Rebecca Kate Hodder, Melanie Kingsland, Nicole Nathan, Sam McCrabb, Adrian Bauman, John Wiggers, Joanna Moullin, Bianca Albers, Maria E Fernandez, Alix Hall, Joanie Sims-Gould, Natalie Taylor, Chris Rissel, Andrew Milat, Andrew Bailey, Samantha Batchelor, John Attia, Luke Wolfenden, Adaptation of public health initiatives: expert views on current guidance and opportunities to advance their application and benefit, Health Education Research, Volume 35, Issue 4, August 2020, Pages 243–257, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaa014
• Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. Retrieved January 19, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631848
• Yoong, S. L., Nathan, N., Reilly, K., Sutherland, R., Straus, S., Barnes, C., Grady, A., & Wolfenden, L. (2019). Adapting implementation strategies: a case study of how to support implementation of healthy canteen policies. Public health, 177, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.07.003

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Baumann, A. A., & Cabassa, L. J. (2020). Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-9.
• Cabassa, L. J., & Baumann, A. A. (2013). A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science, 8(1), 90.
• Chambers, A. & Norton, W. E. (2016). The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(4), S124-S131.
• Miller, C. J., Barnett, M. L., Baumann, A. A., Gutner, C. A., & Wiltsey-Stirman, S. (2021). The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implementation Science, 16(1), 1-12.
• Wiltsey Stirman, S., Baumann, A. A., & Miller, C. J. (2019). The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 14(1), 1-10.

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Sklar M. Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation. Annual Review of Public Health. 2014 Mar 18;35:255-74. 
• [Book] Ehrhart MG, Schneider B, Macey WH. Organizational climate and culture: An introduction to theory, research, and practice. New York, NH; Routledge; 2014.
• Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review. 1996;21:1055-1080.
• Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Harrison MI, Belden CM. Organizational transformation: a systematic review of empirical research in health care and other industries. Medical Care Research and Review. 2013 Apr;70(2):115-42. 
• [Book] Schein E.H., Schein, P. Organizational culture and leadership. 5th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017.

Via IS-2 Welcome Session 2022

• [Online Tool/Resource] Engage for Equity: https://engageforequity.org/
• [Online Tool/Resource] Community Tool Box: https://ctb.ku.edu/en

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

Readings on Participatory Approaches

• [Book] Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity. 3rd ed. (Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, Minkler M, eds.). Wiley and Sons; 2017.

• [Book] Israel, BA, Eng, E., Schulz, A.J., (editors) Methods for Community Based Participatory Research in Health (2^nd edition). Jossey Bass;  2013.

• Luger TM, Hamilton AB, True G. Measuring Community‐Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review. Milbank Quarterly. 2020;98(2):493-553. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12458.

Readings connecting engaged research and D&I

• Pinto RM, Park S, Miles R, Ong PN. Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review. Implementation Research and Practice. 2021;2:2633489520985305.
• Shelton R, Adsul P, Baumann A, Ramanadhan S. Community Engagement to Promote Health Equity through Implementation Science. In: Principles of Community Engagement. US Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; in press.

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Bauer MS, Kirchner JA. Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiat Res. 2020;283:112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025
• [Book] Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.
• Eisman AB, Kilbourne AM, Dopp AR, et al. Economic evaluation in implementation science: Making the business case for implementation strategies. Psychiat Res. 2020;283:112433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.008
• [Book] Neumann PJ, Sanders GD, Russell LB, et al. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2017.
• Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: Second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1093–1103. http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12195
• Special Collection: Economic evaluation in implementation science. <https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/EconomicEvaluation>

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Augustsson H, Ingvarsson S, Nilsen P, et al. Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review. Implementation Science Communications 2021 2:1. 2021;2(1):1-17. doi:10.1186/S43058-021-00110-3
• Brownson RC, Allen P, Jacob RR, et al. Understanding mis-implementation in Public Health practice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015;48(5):543-551.
• Colla CH, Mainor AJ, Hargreaves C, Sequist T, Morden N. Interventions Aimed at Reducing Use of Low-Value Health Services: A Systematic Review. Medical Care Research and Review. 2017;74(5):507-550. doi:10.1177/1077558716656970.
• Helfrich CD, Hartmann CW, Parikh TJ, Au DH. Promoting Health Equity through De-Implementation Research. Ethnicity & Disease. 2019;29(Suppl 1):93. doi:10.18865/ED.29.S1.93.
• McKay VR, Morshed AB, Brownson RC, Proctor EK, Prusaczyk B. Letting go: Conceptualizing intervention de-implementation in public health and social service settings. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2018;62(1-2). doi:10.1002/ajcp.12258
• Niven DJ, Mrklas KJ, Holodinsky JK, et al. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1). doi:10.1186/S12916-015-0488-Z.
• Norton, W.E., Chambers, D.A. Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implementation Sci 15, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0960-9.
• Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings. JAMA. 2019;322(15):1501-1509. doi:10.1001/JAMA.2019.13978 
• Walsh-Bailey, C., Tsai, E., Tabak, R.G. et al. A scoping review of de-implementation frameworks and models. Implementation Sci 16, 100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01173-5.

Determining Study Design

1. [Website]: SIHH Study Section: https://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/DABP/HSS/SIHH
2. Lane-Fall MB, Curran GM, Beidas RS. Scoping implementation science for the beginner: locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 28;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0783-z. PMID: 31253099; PMCID: PMC6599376.

Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Designs

via IS-2 Fall Institute 2021

Overview

1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. PMID: 22310560; PMCID: PMC3731143.
2. Curran GM. Implementation science made too simple: a teaching tool. Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:27. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00001-z. PMID: 32885186; PMCID: PMC7427844.
3. Landes SJ, McBain SA, Curran GM. An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct;280:112513. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PMID: 31434011; PMCID: PMC6779135.

HYBRID TYPE 1 EXAMPLES

1. Ma J, Yank V, Lv N, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Lewis MA, Kramer MK, Snowden MB, Rosas LG, Xiao L, Blonstein AC. Research aimed at improving both mood and weight (RAINBOW) in primary care: A type 1 hybrid design randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:260-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 19. PMID: 26096714; PMCID: PMC4537656.
2. Hagedorn HJ, Stetler CB, Bangerter A, Noorbaloochi S, Stitzer ML, Kivlahan D. An implementation-focused process evaluation of an incentive intervention effectiveness trial in substance use disorders clinics at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014 Jul 9;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-12. PMID: 25008457; PMCID: PMC4106217.
3. Lane-Fall MB, Beidas RS, Pascual JL, Collard ML, Peifer HG, Chavez TJ, Barry ME, Gutsche JT, Halpern SD, Fleisher LA, Barg FK. Handoffs and transitions in critical care (HATRICC): protocol for a mixed methods study of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs. BMC Surg. 2014 Nov 19;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-96. PMID: 25410548; PMCID: PMC4255652.
4. Bramoweth AD, Germain A, Youk AO, Rodriguez KL, Chinman MJ. A hybrid type I trial to increase Veterans’ access to insomnia care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 26;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2437-y. PMID: 29373993; PMCID: PMC5787269.

Hybrid Type 2 Examples

1. Garner BR, Zehner M, Roosa MR, Martino S, Gotham HJ, Ball EL, Stilen P, Speck K, Vandersloot D, Rieckmann TR, Chaple M, Martin EG, Kaiser D, Ford JH 2nd. Testing the implementation and sustainment facilitation (ISF) strategy as an effective adjunct to the Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) strategy: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Nov 17;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0096-7. PMID: 29149909; PMCID: PMC5693537.
2. Abbott A, Schröder K, Enthoven P, Nilsen P, Öberg B. Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 24;8(4):e019906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019906. PMID: 29691246; PMCID: PMC5922514.
3. Rich P, Aarons GA, Takemoto M, Cardenas V, Crist K, Bolling K, Lewars B, Sweet CC, Natarajan L, Shi Y, Full KM, Johnson E, Rosenberg DE, Whitt-Glover M, Marcus B, Kerr J. Implementation-effectiveness trial of an ecological intervention for physical activity in ethnically diverse low income senior centers. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4584-1. Erratum in: BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 22;17 (1):736. PMID: 28720079; PMCID: PMC5516364.
4. Rogers E, Fernandez S, Gillespie C, Smelson D, Hagedorn HJ, Elbel B, Kalman D, Axtmayer A, Kurowski K, Sherman SE. Telephone care coordination for smokers in VA mental health clinics: protocol for a hybrid type-2 effectiveness-implementation trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2013 Mar 15;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-8-7. PMID: 23497630; PMCID: PMC3636068.

Hybrid Type 3 Examples

• Bauer MS, Miller C, Kim B, Lew R, Weaver K, Coldwell C, Henderson K, Holmes S, Seibert MN, Stolzmann K, Elwy AR, Kirchner J. Partnering with health system operations leadership to develop a controlled implementation trial. Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 24;11:22. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0385-7. PMID: 26912342; PMCID: PMC4765154.
• Kilbourne AM, Almirall D, Eisenberg D, Waxmonsky J, Goodrich DE, Fortney JC, Kirchner JE, Solberg LI, Main D, Bauer MS, Kyle J, Murphy SA, Nord KM, Thomas MR. Protocol: Adaptive Implementation of Effective Programs Trial (ADEPT): cluster randomized SMART trial comparing a standard versus enhanced implementation strategy to improve outcomes of a mood disorders program. Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 30;9:132. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0132-x. PMID: 25267385; PMCID: PMC4189548.
• Swindle T, Johnson SL, Whiteside-Mansell L, Curran GM. A mixed methods protocol for developing and testing implementation strategies for evidence-based obesity prevention in childcare: a cluster randomized hybrid type III trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 18;12(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0624-6. PMID: 28720140; PMCID: PMC5516351.
• Cucciare MA, Curran GM, Craske MG, Abraham T, McCarthur MB, Marchant-Miros K, Lindsay JA, Kauth MR, Landes SJ, Sullivan G. Assessing fidelity of cognitive behavioral therapy in rural VA clinics: design of a randomized implementation effectiveness (hybrid type III) trial. Implement Sci. 2016 May 10;11:65. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0432-4. PMID: 27164866; PMCID: PMC4862056.

Pragmatic Research

Overview

• Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013 Jun;40(3):257-65. doi: 10.1177/1090198113486805. PMID: 23709579.
• Gaglio B, Phillips SM, Heurtin-Roberts S, Sanchez MA, Glasgow RE. How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research. Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 28;9:96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0096-x. PMID: 25163664; PMCID: PMC4243945.
• [Online Tool]: https://www.re-aim.org/resources-and-tools/

• Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?“. Lancet. 2005 Jan 1-7;365(9453) 82-93. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17670-8. PMID: 15639683.
• Maclure M. (2009). Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policy-makers. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne, 180(10), 1001–1003. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090076
• Mitchell, S. A., & Chambers, D. A. (2017). Leveraging Implementation Science to Improve Cancer Care Delivery and Patient Outcomes. Journal of oncology practice, 13(8), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2017.024729
• Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., Tunis, S., Bergel, E., Harvey, I., Magid, D. J., & Chalkidou, K. (2009). A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne, 180(10), E47–E57. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090523
• Loudon, K., Treweek, S., Sullivan, F., Donnan, P., Thorpe, K. E., & Zwarenstein, M. (2015). The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 350, h2147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2147
• Norton, W.E., Loudon, K., Chambers, D.A. et al. Designing provider-focused implementation trials with purpose and intent: introducing the PRECIS-2-PS tool. Implementation Sci 16, 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01075-y
• Tunis, S. R., Stryer, D. B., & Clancy, C. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA, 290(12), 1624–1632. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.12.1624
• Glasgow, R. E., Magid, D. J., Beck, A., Ritzwoller, D., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2005). Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: design and measurement recommendations. Medical care, 43(6), 551–557.
• Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., Ory, M. G., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Frontiers in public health, 7, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
• Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American journal of public health, 89(9), 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322
• Glasgow, R. E., & Estabrooks, P. E. (2018). Pragmatic Applications of RE-AIM for Health Care Initiatives in Community and Clinical Settings. Preventing chronic disease, 15, E02. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170271
• Glasgow, R. E., Kessler, R. S., Ory, M. G., Roby, D., Gorin, S. S., & Krist, A. (2014). Conducting rapid, relevant research: lessons learned from the My Own Health Report project. American journal of preventive medicine, 47(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.007
• Krist, A. H., Glasgow, R. E., Heurtin-Roberts, S., Sabo, R. T., Roby, D. H., Gorin, S. N., Balasubramanian, B. A., Estabrooks, P. A., Ory, M. G., Glenn, B. A., Phillips, S. M., Kessler, R., Johnson, S. B., Rohweder, C. L., Fernandez, M. E., & MOHR Study Group (2016). The impact of behavioral and mental health risk assessments on goal setting in primary care. Translational behavioral medicine, 6(2), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0384-2
• Peek, C. J., Glasgow, R. E., Stange, K. C., Klesges, L. M., Purcell, E. P., & Kessler, R. S. (2014). The 5 R’s: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world. Annals of family medicine, 12(5), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1688
• DeGruy, F. V., 3rd, Ewigman, B., DeVoe, J. E., Hughes, L., James, P., Schneider, F. D., Hickner, J., Stange, K., Van Fossen, T., Kuzel, A. J., & Mullen, R. (2015). A Plan for Useful and Timely Family Medicine and Primary Care Research. Family medicine, 47(8), 636–642.
• GLASGOW, R.E., HUEBSCHMANN, A.G., KRIST, A.H. and DEGRUY, F.V. (2019), An Adaptive, Contextual, Technology‐Aided Support (ACTS) System for Chronic Illness Self‐Management. The Milbank Quarterly, 97: 669-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12412
• Glasgow, R. E., Huebschmann, A. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Expanding the CONSORT Figure: Increasing Transparency in Reporting on External Validity. American journal of preventive medicine, 55(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.044
• Pollitt, C. (2013). Ray Pawson (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 580–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313497455
• Pawson, R., & Manzano-Santaella, A. (2012). A realist diagnostic workshop. Evaluation, 18(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012440912
• Pinnock, H., Barwick, M., Carpenter, C. R., Eldridge, S., Grandes, G., Griffiths, C. J., Rycroft-Malone, J., Meissner, P., Murray, E., Patel, A., Sheikh, A., Taylor, S. J., & StaRI Group (2017). Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 356, i6795. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6795
• Kemp, C. G., Wagenaar, B. H., & Haroz, E. E. (2019). Expanding Hybrid Studies for Implementation Research: Intervention, Implementation Strategy, and Context. Frontiers in public health, 7, 325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00325

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Anderson, DE, Vennix, JAM, Richardson, GP, Rouwette, EAJA. Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 5, (2007), pp. 691-694
• Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, et al. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annual Review of Public Health. 2017;38(1):null.
• Hwang S, Birken SA, Melvin CL, Rohweder CL, Smith JD. Designs and Methods for Implementation Research: Advancing the Mission of the CTSA Program. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020; 4(3):159-67. Epub 2020/03/04. Doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.16.
• Kim B, Sullivan JL, Ritchie MJ, et al. Comparing variations in implementation processes and influences across multiple sites: What works, for whom, and how? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112520. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112520
• Landes SJ, McBain SA, Curran GM. An introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Oct; 280:112513. doi:10.1016/ j.psychres.2019.112513. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PMID: 31434011; PMCID: PMC6779135.
• [Book] Reichardt C, Mark M. Quasi-experimentation. In: Wholey J, Hatry H, Newcomer K, eds. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 2004: 126-149.
• Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. The Implementation Research Logic Model: A Method for Planning, Executing, Reporting, and Synthesizing Implementation Projects. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8.
• West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, et al. Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1359-1366.
• Wolfenden L, Foy R, Presseau J, et al. Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers. BMJ. 2021;372:m3721. Published 2021 Jan 18. doi:10.1136/bmj.m3721.
• [Book] Vennix, Jac AM. Group model building. Chichester, 1996.

via IS-2 Winter 2021 Institute

• Siegal, S. (1964). Familial paroxysmal polyserositis. The American Journal of Medicine, 36(6), 893-918. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(64)90119-6
• Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C. F., Martinez, R. G., Weiner, B. J., Kim, M., Barwick, M., & Comtois, K. A. (2015). The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: a methodology to promote rigorous evaluation. Implementation Science, 10, 2. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0193-x
• Damschroder, L., Aron, D., Keith, R., Kirsh, S., Alexander, J., & Lowery, J. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
• Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., . . . Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
• Proctor, E., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24-34. doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4
• [Book] Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to Measurement Theory: Waveland Press.
• Lewis, C. C., Fischer, S., Weiner, B. J., Stanick, C., Kim, M., & Martinez, R. G. (2015). Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria Implementation Science, 10, 155. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0342-x
• Society for Implementation Research Collaboration. (no date). Initiatives.   Retrieved from https://societyforimplementationresearchcollaboration.org/ sirc-projects/
• [Book] Gerring, J. (2001). Social science methodology: A criterial framework: Cambridge University Press.
• Martinez, R. G., Lewis, C. C., & Weiner, B. J. (2014). Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implementation Science, 9, 118. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0118-8
• Glisson, C., & Schoenwald, S. (2005). The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Mental Health Services Research, 7. doi:10.1007/s11020-005-7456-1
• Glisson, C., Schoenwald, S., Kelleher, K., Landsverk, J., Hoagwood, K., Mayberg, S., & Green, P. (2008). Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of mental health services: Implications for research and practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Special Issue: Improving mental health services, 35.
• Glisson, C., Schoenwald, S. K., & Hemmelgarn, A. (2010). Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. Journal of Consulting in Clinical Psychology, 78. doi:10.1037/a0019160

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health.1999;89(9):1322-1327.
• Mettert, K., Lewis, C., Dorsey, C., Halko, H., & Weiner, B. (2020). Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures’ psychometric properties. Implementation Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489520936644
• Special collection that presents the Psychometric and Pragmatic Rating Scale (PAPERS) and the results of systematics reviews in which PAPERS is applied: View the collection in Implementation Research and Practice
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65-76.
• Proctor E, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24-  34.
• Rabin BA, Lewis CC, Norton WE, et al. Measurement resources for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2016;11:42.
• Shelton, R. C., Chambers, D. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2020). An extension of RE-AIM to enhance sustainability: addressing dynamic context and promoting health equity over time. Frontiers in public health, 8, 134.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• [Book] Green LW, Gielen AC, Ottoson JM, Peterson D, Kreuter M. (Eds). Health Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation: Creating Behavioral, Environmental and Policy Change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022.
• Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015 May 8; 350:h2147.
• Norton WE, Loudon K, Chambers DA, Zwarenstein M. Designing provider focused implementation trials with purpose and intent: introducing the PRECIS-2-PS tool. Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):7.

Webtools

• Stakeholder Engagement Navigator. An interactive web tool that can assist researchers in selecting stakeholder engagement approaches and methods aligned with their resources and purpose. https://Dicemethods.org .
• Expanded CONSORT. https://medschool.cuanschutz.edu/docs/librariesprovider94/di-docs/exconsort-online_v1.pdf?sfvrsn=933106b9_0. Aims to encourage more transparent reporting of original research. To assist researchers in using the expanded CONSORT, a user’s guide and fillable expanded CONSORT diagram are available.
• CONSORT-equity. http://www.consort-statement.org/extensions/equity Aims to improve more transparent reporting of health equity when relevant to clinical trials.¹²² The website includes useful resources including a checklist and flow diagram that can be downloaded.
• PRECIS-2 tool. http://www.precis-2.org Developed to guide researchers to explicitly consider nine factors (originally 10) related to external validity when designing a study. PRECIS-2 visually summarizes the extent to which a trial is more versus less pragmatic for each of the nine factors, recognizing that no study is entirely pragmatic or entirely explanatory. Can be used when proposing or reporting on a study to allow both reviewers and potential adopters to interpret the relative strengths and weaknesses of the study from an external validity perspective.
• RE-AIM. http://www.RE-AIM.org. The acronym refers to Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance, all important dimensions in the consideration of D & I research and in the external validity or applicability of research results in original studies for the alternative settings and circumstances in which they might be applied.
• PRECEDE-PROCEED. www.lgreen.net. The two acronyms refer for health planning and evaluation to Predisposing, Enabling and Reinforcing Constructs in Educational/Economic Diagnosis & Evaluation and Policy, Regulatory, and Organizational Constructs in Educational and Environmental Development.   
• Task Force on Community Preventive Services  http://www.thecommunityguide.org.   The Community Guide provides a repository of the 200+ systematic reviews conducted by the Task Force, an independent, interdisciplinary group with staff support by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Each review gives attention to the “applicability” of the conclusions beyond the study populations and settings in which the original studies were conducted.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Skivington L, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
• Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.
• Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:64.
• Lewis CC, Mettert KD, Stanick CF, et al. The psychometric and pragmatic evidence rating scale (PAPERS) for measure development and evaluation. Implementation Research and Practice. 2021.
• Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147, and
• Norton WE, Loudon K, Chambers DA, Zwarenstein M. Designing provider-focused implementation trials with purpose and intent: introducing the PRECIS-2-PS tool. Implementation Science. 2021;16:7
• Proctor EK, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65-76.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Albright K, Gechter K, Kempe A. Importance of mixed methods in pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13:400–407.
• Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. August 2011. National Institutes of Health.
• [Book] Cresswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed method research. 3nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
• Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz SM, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt, M., Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy in Ment Health. 2011;38:44–53.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW. Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research. Annu Rev Public Health. Apr 1 2018;39:27-53.
• Carmichael L, Townshend TG, Fischer TB, et al. Urban planning as an enabler of urban health: Challenges and good practice in England following the 2012 planning and public health reforms. Land Use Policy. 2019/05/01/ 2019;84:154-162.
• Koorts, H., Eakin, E., Estabrooks, P. et al. Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 15, 51 (2018).
• McCrabb S, Lane C, Hall A, et al. Scaling-up evidence-based obesity interventions: A systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale-up penalty. Obesity Reviews. 2019;20(7):964-982.
• [Book] Riley BL, Garcia JM, Edwards NC. 2007. Organizational Change for Obesity Prevention—Perspectives, Possibilities and Potential Pitfalls. In Handbook of Obesity Prevention:239-61: Springer.
• Rosas LG, Espinosa PR, Jimenez FM, King AC. The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43(1):215-234.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2016: 43(6). Special Issue: System-level implementation of evidence-based practice. Special issue editors: Byron J. Powell and Rinad S. Beidas.
• Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership, & Governance, 2019: 43(4). Special Issue: The Future of Human Service Organizational & Management Research. Special issue editors: Bowen McBeath & Karen Hopkin.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implementation Science. 2021 Dec;16(1):1-6.
• Kilbourne AM, Glasgow RE, Chambers DA. What can implementation science do for you? Key success stories from the field. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2020 Nov;35(2):783-7.
• Rudd BN, Davis M, Beidas RS. Integrating implementation science in clinical research to maximize public health impact: a call for the reporting and alignment of implementation strategy use with implementation outcomes in clinical research. Implementation Science. 2020 Dec;15(1):1-1.
• Shelton RC, Lee M, Brotzman LE, Wolfenden L, Nathan N, Wainberg ML. What is dissemination and implementation science? An introduction and opportunities to advance behavioral medicine and public health globally. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2020 Feb;27(1):3-20.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Allen M, Wilhelm A, Ortega LE, Pergament S, Bates N, Cunningham B. Applying a Race(ism)-Conscious Adaptation of the CFIR Framework to Understand Implementation of a School-Based Equity-Oriented Intervention. Ethn Dis. 2021;31(Suppl 1):375-388.
• Cook CR, Lyon AR, Locke J, Waltz T, Powell BJ. Adapting a Compilation of Implementation Strategies to Advance School-Based Implementation Research and Practice. Prev Sci. 08 2019;20(6):914-935.
• Gortmaker SL, Wang YC, Long MW, Giles CM, Ward ZJ, Barrett JL, Kenney EL, Sonneville KR, Afzal AS, Resch SC, Cradock AL. Three interventions that reduce childhood obesity are projected to save more than they cost to implement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(11):1932–1939.

via Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice

• Pollack Porter KM, Campbell L, Carson A, Chang E, Clark L, Dee M, Harris J, Lockett B, Martinez O, McFarland J, Mills D, Perkins B, Tao L, White S, Sanchez E. Driving health equity in the workplace. American Heart Association CEO Roundtable, 2021.
• Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research & Educational Trust. Employer health benefits: 2021 annual survey. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research & Educational Trust, 2021.
• International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Special Issue (2021): Worker Safety, Health, and Well-Being in the USA.
• [Book] Total Worker Health. 2019. Hudson HL, Nigam JAS, Sauter SL, Chosewood C, Schill AL, Howard J (Editors). American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
•  American Journal of Public Health: The Occupational Safety and Health Act at 50, 1970–2020: Special Section (pp. 621–647).

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Allen P, Pilar M, Walsh-Bailey C, et al. Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 2020;15(1):1-17.
• Ashcraft LE, Quinn DA, Brownson RC. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implementation Science. 2020;15(1):1-7.
• Brownson, R. C., Kumanyika, S. K., Kreuter, M. W., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021). Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implementation Science, 16(1), 1-16.
• Combs T, Nelson KL, Luke D, McGuire FH, Cruden G, Henson RM, Adams DR, Hoagwood KE, Purtle J. Simulating the role of knowledge brokers in policy making in state agencies: An agent‐based model.
• Doucet, F. (2019). Centering the Margins: (Re)defining Useful Research Evidence Through Critical Perspectives. New York: William T Grant Foundation.
• Emmons KM, Chambers DA. Policy Implementation Science – An Unexplored Strategy to Address Social Determinants of Health. Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):133-138. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.1.133. PMID: 33519163; PMCID: PMC7843047.
• Haynes, A., Rowbotham, S. J., Redman, S., Brennan, S., Williamson, A., & Moore, G. (2018). What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 1-27.
• Hoagwood KE, Purtle J, Spandorfer J, Peth-Pierce R, Horwitz SM. Aligning dissemination and implementation science with health policies to improve children’s mental health. American Psychologist, 2020;75(8):1130.
• Nilsen P, Ståhl C, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science, 2013;8:63.
• Oliver K, Lorenc T, Innvær S. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2014;12(1):34.
• Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426-431.

D&I frameworks for health equity

Via IS-2 Summer 2021/Fall 2021 Institute

• [Blog Post]: https://publichealth.wustl.edu/bringing-a-health-equity-lens-to-implementation-science-frameworks/
• Allen, M., Wilhelm, A., Ortega, L. E., Pergament, S., Bates, N., & Cunningham, B. (2021). Applying a Race(ism)-Conscious Adaptation of the CFIR Framework to Understand Implementation of a School-Based Equity-Oriented Intervention. Ethnicity & disease, 31(Suppl 1), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.31.S1.375
• Baumann, A. A., & Cabassa, L. J. (2020). Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC health services research, 20(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4975-3
• Brownson, R. C., Kumanyika, S. K., Kreuter, M. W., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021). Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implementation science : IS, 16(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0
• Galaviz, K. I., Breland, J. Y., Sanders, M., Breathett, K., Cerezo, A., Gil, O., Hollier, J. M., Marshall, C., Wilson, J. D., & Essien, U. R. (2020). Implementation Science to Address Health Disparities During the Coronavirus Pandemic. Health equity, 4(1), 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2020.0044
• Shelton, R. C., Adsul, P., & Oh, A. (2021). Recommendations for Addressing Structural Racism in Implementation Science: A Call to the Field. Ethnicity & disease, 31(Suppl 1), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.31.S1.357
• Shelton, R. C., Chambers, D. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2020). An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time. Frontiers in public health, 8, 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134
• Snell-Rood, C., Jaramillo, E. T., Hamilton, A. B., Raskin, S. E., Nicosia, F. M., & Willging, C. (2021). Advancing health equity through a theoretically critical implementation science. Translational behavioral medicine, ibab008.
• Woodward, E. N., Matthieu, M. M., Uchendu, U. S., Rogal, S., & Kirchner, J. E. (2019). The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment. Implementation science : IS, 14(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0861-y
• Woodward, E. N., Singh, R. S., Ndebele-Ngwenya, P., Melgar Castillo, A., Dickson, K. S., & Kirchner, J. E. (2021). A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks. Implementation science communications, 2(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00146-5

Health Equity Resources

• [Bibliography] Readings/Resources/Curricula on Anti-Racism and Health Equity. Implementation Science Initiative/Columbia CTSA. Updated September 2021. https://www.irvinginstitute.columbia.edu/file/5996/download?token=sy5IYl5A
• [Video Library] Implementation Science Series on Health and Equity. Implementation Science Initiative/Columbia CTSA. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvTuZ00BTvIZiW7oqXeBFNF8NXHeFFsds
• [Scoring Tool] Assessment tool for grant proposals https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/suppl/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305221

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agenor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453-1463.
• Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2:5-8.
• Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):28.
• Eslava-Schmalbach J, Garzon-Orjuela N, Elias V, Reveiz L, Tran N, Langlois EV. Conceptual framework of equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):80.
• Ford CL, Griffith DM, Bruce M, Gilbert K, eds. Racism: Science and Tools for the Public Health Professional. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association Press; 2019.
• Kumanyika SK. A Framework for Increasing Equity Impact in Obesity Prevention. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(10):1350-1357. [Supplement B]
• Napoles AM, Stewart AL. Transcreation: an implementation science framework for community-engaged behavioral interventions to reduce health disparities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):710.
• Shelton RC, Adsul P, Oh A, Moise N, Griffith DM. Application of an antiracism lens in the field of implementation science (IS): Recommendations for reframing implementation research with a focus on justice and racial equity. Implementation Research & Practice. 2021;2:1-19.
• Woodward EN, Matthieu MM, Uchendu US, Rogal S, Kirchner JE. The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):26.

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Amanyire G, Semitala FC, Namusobya J, Katuramu R, Kampiire L, Wallenta J, Charlebois E, Camlin C, Kahn J, Chang W, Glidden D. Effects of a multicomponent intervention to streamline initiation of antiretroviral therapy in Africa: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. The lancet HIV. 2016 Nov 1;3(11):e539-48.
• Baptiste S, Manouan A, Garcia P, Etya’ale H, Swan T, Jallow W. Community-led monitoring: When community data drives implementation strategies. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2020 Oct;17(5):415-21.
• Downs JA, Mwakisole AH, Chandika AB, Lugoba S, Kassim R, Laizer E, Magambo KA, Lee MH, Kalluvya SE, Downs DJ, Fitzgerald DW. Educating religious leaders to promote uptake of male circumcision in Tanzania: a cluster randomized trial. The Lancet. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1124-32.
• Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the Sustainable Development Goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. The Lancet Global Health. 2018 Feb 1;6(2):e152-68.
• Roy M, Bolton Moore C, Sikazwe I, Holmes CB. A review of differentiated service delivery for HIV treatment: effectiveness, mechanisms, targeting, and scale. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2019 Aug;16(4):324-34.
• Yang F, Zhang TP, Tang W, Ong JJ, Alexander M, Forastiere L, Kumar N, Li KT, Zou F, Yang L, Mi G. Pay-it-forward gonorrhea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020 Aug 1;20(8):976-82.
• Zuora D, Sudoi RK, Akhwale WS, Ndiritu M, Hamer DH, Rowe AK, Snow RW. The effect of mobile phone text-message reminders on Kenyan health workers’ adherence to malaria treatment guidelines: a cluster randomized trial. The Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):795-803.
• de Walque D. The use of financial incentives to prevent unhealthy behaviors: a review. Social Science & Medicine. 2020 Sep 1;261:113236.
• Khan AJ, Khowaja S, Khan FS, et al. Engaging the private sector to increase tuberculosis case detection: an impact evaluation study. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2012;12(8):608-616.

VIA DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Koorts H, Eakin E, Estabrooks P, Timperio A, Salmon J, Bauman A. Implementation and scale up of population physical activity interventions for clinical and community settings: the PRACTIS guide. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2018 Dec;15(1):1-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0678-0.
• Kwan BM, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE, Morrato EH, Luke DA. Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43(1):331-353. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052220-112457.
• Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health policy and planning. 2012 Aug 1;27(5):365-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr054.
• [Book] Pauwels L, Mannay D. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage; 2019.

via DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Akbar MB, Garnelo-Gomez I, Ndupu L, Barnes E,  Foster C. An analysis of social marketing practice: Factors associated with success. Health Marketing Quarterly, 2021 Nov 16; 1-21 Online ahead of print.  DOI: 10.1080/07359683.2021.1997525.
• Chichirez CM, Purcărea VL. Health marketing and behavioral change: a review of the literature. Journal of Medicine and Life, 2018; 11(1):15-19.
• Dix CF, Brennan L, Reid M, McCaffrey TA, Molenaar A, Barklamb A, Chin S, Truby H. Nutrition Meets Social Marketing: Targeting Health Promotion Campaigns to Young Adults Using the Living and Eating for Health Segments. Nutrients, 2021; 13(9):3151.
• [Book] Kotler P, Keller KL. Marketing Management. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited; 2016.
• Kreuter MW, Bernhardt J. Reframing the dissemination challenge: A marketing and distribution perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 2009; 99(12):2123-2127. 
• Williams A, Bowen S, Murphy M, Costa K, Echavarria C, Knight M. Enhancing the Adoption of Evidence-Based Health Marketing and Promotion Strategies in Local Communities: Building a Communication Dissemination and Support System for the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Health Promotion Practice, 2021; Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/15248399211013817.
• Woolf SH, Purnell JQ, Simon SM, Zimmerman EB, Camberos GJ, Haley A, et al. Translating Evidence into Population Health Improvement: Strategies and Barriers. Annual Review of Public Health, 2015; 36: 463-482.

via DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Ben Charif A, Zomahoun HT, Gogovor A, Abdoulaye Samri M, Massougbodji J, Wolfenden L, Ploeg J, Zwarenstein M, Milat AJ, Rheault N, Ousseine YM. Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2022 Dec;20(1):1-20.
• Bulthuis SE, Kok MC, Raven J, Dieleman MA. Factors influencing the scale-up of public health interventions in low-and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic literature review. Health policy and planning. 2020 Mar 1;35(2):219-34.
• Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science. 2013 Dec;8(1):1-1.
• Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement. Bmj. 2019 May 10;365.
• Hailemariam M, Bustos T, Montgomery B, Barajas R, Evans LB, Drahota A. Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review. Implementation Science. 2019 Dec;14(1):1-2.
• McKay H, Naylor PJ, Lau E, Gray SM, Wolfenden L, Milat A, Bauman A, Race D, Nettlefold L, Sims-Gould J. Implementation and scale-up of physical activity and behavioural nutrition interventions: an evaluation roadmap. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2019 Dec;16(1):1-2.
• Milat AJ, Bauman A, Redman S. Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions. Implementation Science. 2015 Dec;10(1):1-1.
• Moullin JC, Sklar M, Green A, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Reeder K, Aarons GA. Advancing the pragmatic measurement of sustainment: a narrative review of measures. Implementation science communications. 2020 Dec;1(1):1-8.
• Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. American journal of public health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2059-67.
• Shelton RC, Cooper BR, Stirman SW. The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and health care. Annual review of public health. 2018 Apr 1;39:55-76.

via DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH IN HEALTH: TRANSLATING SCIENCE TO PRACTICE

• Brownson RC, Proctor EK, Luke DA, Baumann AA, Staub M, Brown MT, et al. Building capacity for dissemination and implementation research: one university’s experience. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):104.
• Chambers DA, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Straus SE. Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing D&I research training programs. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):593-601.
• Davis R, D’Lima D. Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):97.
• Luke DA, Baumann AA, Carothers BJ, Landsverk J, Proctor EK. Forging a link between mentoring and collaboration: a new training model for implementation science. Implementation Science. 2016/10/13 2016;11(1):137. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0499-y.

via IS-2 Welcome Session 2021/2022

• VandenbrouckeJP, Pearce N. From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions. Clinical epidemiology. 2018;10:253.
• Pohl, C. (2014). From complexity to solvability: The praxeology of transdisciplinary research. In Transdisciplinary Sustainability Studies (pp. 119-134). Routledge.
• Peters D H, Adam T, Alonge O, Agyepong I A, Tran N. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it BMJ 2013; 347 :f6753 doi:10.1136/bmj.f6753
• Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL. Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 12;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96. PMID: 23062065; PMCID: PMC3541090.
• FandinoW. Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2019 Aug;63(8):611.
• Riva JJ, Malik KM, Burnie SJ, Endicott AR, BusseJW. What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2012 Sep;56(3):167.
• HulleyS, Cummings S, editors. Chapter 2: Conceiving the research question. In: Designing Clinical Research, an Epidemiological Approach. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1988:12–17.
• Quanbeck A, Gustafson DH, MarschLA, ChihMY, Kornfield R, McTavish F, Johnson R, Brown RT, Mares ML, Shah DV. Implementing a mobile health system to integrate the treatment of addiction into primary care: a hybrid implementation-effectiveness study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(1):e37.
• Aarons GA, Fettes DL, Sommerfeld DH, Palinkas LA. Mixed methods for implementation research: application to evidence-based practice implementation and staff turnover in community-based organizations providing child welfare services. Child maltreatment. 2012 Feb;17(1):67-79.
• Chinman M, Woodward EN, Curran GM, Hausmann LRM. Harnessing Implementation Science to Increase the Impact of Health Equity Research. Med Care. 2017 Sep;55 Suppl 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 9 2):S16-S23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000769. PMID: 28806362; PMCID: PMC5639697.
• Kumanyika SK. A Framework for Increasing Equity Impact in Obesity Prevention. Am J Public Health. 2019 Oct;109(10):1350-1357. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305221. Epub 2019 Aug 15. PMID: 31415203; PMCID: PMC6727309. [Supplement B: Potential Tool for Rating Research Proposals on Sensitivity to Health Equity Issues]

D&I Grant Writing – Key Readings and Resources

• Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Dobbins M, Emmons KM, Kerner JF, Padek M, Proctor EK, Stange KC. Concocting that Magic Elixir: Successful Grant Application Writing in Dissemination and Implementation Research. Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):710-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12356. Epub 2015 Nov 18. PMID: 26577630; PMCID: PMC4739635.
• Crable EL, Biancarelli D, Walkey AJ, Allen CG, Proctor EK, Drainoni ML. Standardizing an approach to the evaluation of implementation science proposals. Implement Sci. 2018 May 29;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0770-5. PMID: 29843740; PMCID: PMC5975262.
• Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL. Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 12;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96. PMID: 23062065; PMCID: PMC3541090.
• [PDF] (Glasgow 2017): Writing implementation research grant proposals: 10 key ingredients….and a few reflections (ucdenver.edu)
• [Sample D&I grant applications] NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences / Implementation Science: Sample D&I Grant Applications
• [Online Database] Grid-Enabled Measures Database

Is it time for implementation research?

• Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Wells KB, Jones L, Collins LM, Duan N, Mittman BS, Wallace A, Tabak RG, Ducharme L, Chambers DA, Neta G, Wiley T, Landsverk J, Cheung K, Cruden G. An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215. PMID: 28384085; PMCID: PMC5384265.
• Lane-Fall MB, Curran GM, Beidas RS. Scoping implementation science for the beginner: locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 28;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0783-z. PMID: 31253099; PMCID: PMC6599376.
• Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 25;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8. PMID: 32988389; PMCID: PMC7523057.
• [PDF Resource] Logic Model Development Guide – W.K. Kellogg Foundation (2004)